AI Model Intelligence Platform
← Back to compare

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision

Gemini 1.5 ProLlama 3.2 90B Vision
ProviderGoogleMeta
Context Window2,000,000128,000
Release Date2024-02-152024-09-25
Input Price$1.25/ 1M tokens$2.00/ 1M tokens
Output Price$5.00/ 1M tokens$2.00/ 1M tokens
Best formultimodal · long-context analysis · chatbot · document processing—

Capabilities

Gemini 1.5 ProLlama 3.2 90B Vision
Vision✓✗
Reasoning✓✗
Coding✓✗
Audio✓✗
Tools✓✗
Long Context✓✗

Ranking Comparison

Gemini 1.5 ProLlama 3.2 90B Vision
Overall76.915.8
Benchmark70.80
Capability1000
Price Efficiency100100
Context10064

Overall = Benchmark 50% + Capability 20% + Price Efficiency 20% + Context 10%.

Benchmark Comparison

Gemini 1.5 ProLlama 3.2 90B Vision
Coding——
Reasoning——
Math——
Vision——

Price History

Gemini 1.5 Pro

DateInputOutput
2026-08-11$1.25$5.00

/ 1M tokens

Llama 3.2 90B Vision

No price history yet.

/ 1M tokens

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Google's long-context multimodal model supporting up to 2M tokens.

Llama 3.2 90B Vision

Llama 3.2 90B vision model

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Data Reliability

Benchmark · VerifiedOfficial · Verified

Data confidence: 90%

Llama 3.2 90B Vision

Data Reliability

Benchmark · ExperimentalOfficial · Experimental

Data confidence: 50%

Why compare these models?

Choose Gemini 1.5 Pro if:

  • • Higher overall score
  • • Lower input price

Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision if:

  • • General purpose workloads

Frequently Asked Questions

Which model is better: Gemini 1.5 Pro or Llama 3.2 90B Vision?

Based on overall scores, Gemini 1.5 Pro ranks higher (76.9 vs 15.8). See the comparison table for a full breakdown.

Which model is cheaper: Gemini 1.5 Pro or Llama 3.2 90B Vision?

Gemini 1.5 Pro is cheaper: $1.25 vs $2 per 1M input tokens.

What are the capability differences between Gemini 1.5 Pro and Llama 3.2 90B Vision?

Gemini 1.5 Pro: Vision, Reasoning, Coding, Audio, Tools, Long Context